In re The City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Separate appeals by The City of New York and by William B. Opdyke and another, individually and as trustees, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 29th day of November, 1905, confirming the report of a referee and directing the payment of certain awards.
1Opinion of the Court
Scott, J.:
The present appeal brings up for determination the question as to who should receive an award amounting to $13,544.71-for a piece of land designated in the report' of the commissioners as parcel No. 2, and which has been awarded to Peter Sheridan and others, heirs of *298Margaretta Sheridan, deceased. When the report came before the court for confirmation, the city of Mew York and the appellants Opdyke both claimed that the awards.should be made to, them, as also did one-Tier (not represented ori this appeal), who claimed a part of-the'award. The court thereupon confirmed the report so…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In the Matter of Opening Eleventh AvenueNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Mott v. . EnoNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Potter v. BoyceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- De Peyster v. . MaliNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- In re The Mayor of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Mayor, Aldermen & CommonaltyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Auburn & Syracuse Electric Railroad v. HeadleyNew York Supreme Court · 1922
- In re City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1934
- In re Clinton Street Police Station SiteNew York Supreme Court · 1910