Legal Opinion
United States v. Panebianco
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 8, 1954No. 89, Docket 22830PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
The appellant, with others, was in-dieted by a grand jury and charged with cr*me conspiracy to violate the narc°tic laws. He originally pleaded “not guilty.” When the case was called for trial he appeared with counsel before Judge Irving R. Kaufman and, after . , ,. , , . interrogation by the court, changed his plea to “guilty.” A pre-sentence report was ordered and sentence was adjourned. Six weeks later, on the day set for sentence, the defendant appeared with the same counsel before Judge Ryan, and counsel stated that the defendant had informed him “this morning” that he is not guilty and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. ColonnaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
- Goo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- United States v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Howard E. SaftCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Charles Daniel Everett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- United States v. ParrinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- William L. Poole v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- Duane A. Verdon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.