Goo v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant was convicted in the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii, on his plea of guilty to an information charging criminal violations of the Internal Revenue Code. Upon this appeal from the judgment of conviction, he claims the District Court erred in denying his motion, made pursuant to 32(d) Fed.Rules Crim.Proc. 18 U.S.C.A., to withdraw his plea of guilty.
He contends that Section 32(d) of F.R. C.P. confers upon him the absolute right to withdraw his guilty plea at any time prior to imposition of sentence.
We find no merit in this contention. There is complete…
2Cited by22 opinions
- Sydney B. Kadwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Charles Daniel Everett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- State v. CarrascoIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Friedman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
- State v. BallardIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.