Legal Opinion

Loughridge v. Haugan

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 9, 1899PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Bill for Foreclosure.—Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Farlin Q. Ball, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sears

Appellees filed a bill for the foreclosure of a trust deed. Appellee Haugan filed his affidavit to the effect that all of the allegations contained in the bill of complaint are true in substance and in fact;

The court, upon motion of appellees, entered an order appointing a receiver of the rents and profits of the premises in question. The appointment ivas pendente lite, and shortly after the filing of the bill. A verified answer to the bill of complaint and certain affidavits were filed by appellant upon the same .day upon which the order was entered, and by supplemental record, it appears…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. Illinois Steel Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Oakford v. RobinsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892
  3. Niccolls v. Peninsular Stove Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1892

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ortengren v. RiceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903
  2. Frank v. SiegelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931
  3. McLester v. RoseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902
  4. Ryan v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902
  5. West v. AdamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API