Legal Opinion

State Bank v. Hafferkamp

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 30, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRagland, P. J.

Plaintiff’s suit is on a promissory note. The defendants are the maker and certain indorsers. In their answers they pleaded a number of defenses, and then by cross-bills in which the same matters are set forth they asked the cancellation of the note sued on and that of two others held by plaintiff, alleged to have been executed at the same time and under the same circumstances and with respect to which they sustained the same relations as parties. The avoidance of a multiplicity of suits is the only ground for equitable relief appearing in the cross-bills. Whether the facts pleaded were…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Appleton v. KennonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1854
  2. Wright v. Independence National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1899
  3. First National Bank v. LeavittSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  4. Schnerr v. LempSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853
  5. Citizens Bank v. EvansMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hansen v. DuvallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  2. Nelson v. HudsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Aven v. EllisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API