Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Brown v. Allstate Insurance

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided November 1, 1999No. 3065Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partConnor, Judge

I concur with the majority’s conclusion that the trial judge erred in admitting evidence of whether Brown was criminally charged with arson. However, I respectfully disagree that the admission of this evidence was prejudicial under the facts of this case.

Because this is an action at law tried by a judge without a jury, we are bound by the factual findings of the trial judge. See Ateyeh v. Volkswagen of Florence, Inc., 288 S.C. 101, 841 S.E.2d 378 (1986) (a cause of action for breach of an insurance contract is an action for damages under the contract); Moore v. Crowley & Assocs., Inc., 254…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Builders Steel Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  3. Timmons v. South Carolina Tricentennial CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  4. Fortson v. Cotton States Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  5. Cherry v. ThomassonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API