Leech v. Armstrong
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Coleman, J.:
Leech and Mackie instituted this action to recover judgment in the sum of $10,318.15, a balance alleged to be due from the defendant Armstrong for work and labor performed.
This litigation grew out of this state of facts: On October 10,1922, the highway department of the State of Nevada, hereinafter referred to as the highway department, entered into a contract with Armstrong, designated contract 65, whereby it was agreed: “ * * * The party of the first part (highway department) hereby purchases of and from the party of the second part (Armstrong), and the party…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- National Bank v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- National Bank v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Goodman v. NiblackSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Gold-Mining Co. v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Reynolds v. Crawfordsville First National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Organ v. Winnemucca State Bank & Trust Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1933
- Hilton v. HymersNevada Supreme Court · 1937
- Neill Et Ux. v. MikulichNevada Supreme Court · 1937
- Neill Et Ux. v. MikulichNevada Supreme Court · 1937
- State v. BanksNevada Supreme Court · 1935