Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Bolden v. Doe (In re Adoption of J.S.)

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 2014No. 20120751PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice LEE,

opinion of the Court in part:

1 1 William Bolden is the putative father of a child (J.S.) born in 2011. The case before us on appeal is an adoption proceeding involving John and Jane Doe, the would-be adoptive parents of J.S. Bolden tried to intervene in and object to the Does' adoption of J.S. He was barred from doing so because he failed to preserve his legal rights as a father by filing a paternity affidavit within the time prescribed by "Utah Code section 78B-6-121(8).

T2 This provision of the Utah Adoption Act prescribes the requirements that an unwed father must meet in order…

2Cases cited104 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Adoption B.B. v. R.K.B.Utah Supreme Court · 2017
  2. In Re Adoption of B.Y.Utah Supreme Court · 2015
  3. BV Jordanelle, LLC v. Old Republic National Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  4. In re K.A.S.Utah Supreme Court · 2016
  5. In re K.T.B.Utah Supreme Court · 2020

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API