People v. O'Toole
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Smith, J.
We hold that on the facts of this case defendant’s acquittal of a charge of first degree robbery that was based on the alleged display of a firearm barred the People from introducing, at a later trial for second degree robbery, evidence that a firearm was displayed.
*337I
Defendant was charged with first and second degree robbery and other crimes. The first degree charge was brought under Penal Law § 160.15 (4), which is applicable when a person “forcibly steals property” and “he or another participant in the crime . . . [djisplays what appears to be a pistol, revolver,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- People v. MelendezNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. MassieNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- People v. AcevedoNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. O'TooleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by10 opinions
- The People v. Kevin FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 2017
- Matter of Clark v. NewbauerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- The People v. Luis OrtizNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
- People v. KavalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- People v. OrtizAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.