Legal Opinion

People v. O'Toole

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 10, 2013PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Smith, J.

We hold that on the facts of this case defendant’s acquittal of a charge of first degree robbery that was based on the alleged display of a firearm barred the People from introducing, at a later trial for second degree robbery, evidence that a firearm was displayed.

*337I

Defendant was charged with first and second degree robbery and other crimes. The first degree charge was brought under Penal Law § 160.15 (4), which is applicable when a person “forcibly steals property” and “he or another participant in the crime . . . [djisplays what appears to be a pistol, revolver,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. People v. MelendezNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. MassieNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. People v. AcevedoNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. People v. O'TooleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. The People v. Kevin FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Matter of Clark v. NewbauerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. The People v. Luis OrtizNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. People v. KavalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  5. People v. OrtizAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API