Legal Opinion
In re: Paul Glen Everett
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided August 13, 2015No. 15-13371PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BY THE PANEL:
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A), Paul Glen Everett has filed pro se an application seeking, an order authorizing the district court to consider a second or successive petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Everett wishes to raise three claims: (1) he is actually innocent of sexual battery and first-degree murder; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective; and (3) his confession was made under duress. For the reasons below, we deny Everett’s application for leave to file a second or successive habeas petition. We also deny as moot Everett’s request for appointment of counsel. .
We…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re: Gary BaptisteCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- In Re: Eric CatheyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- Johnson v. Warden, Georgia Diagnostic & Classification PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Demarcus Sears v. Warden GDCPCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023
- In re: Octavious WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.