Benson v. Syntex Laboratories, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and in the exercise of discretion and as modified affirmed without costs and new trial granted on future damages and punitive damages only in accordance with the following Memorandum: This action was brought on behalf of twin sisters, now adults, who had interrupted growth and development as a result of consuming a defective baby formula known as Neo-Mull-Soy. They consumed the formula from November 1978 until the product’s recall in August 1979 and allegedly have permanent intellectual and emotional disabilities as a result of malnourishment.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lolik v. Big v. Supermarkets, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Loughry v. Lincoln First Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Moffatt v. MoffattNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Delgado v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 1Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Moffatt v. MoffattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Schmidt v. Buffalo General HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Wood v. Strong Memorial Hospital of University of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000