Legal Opinion
Humphrey v. County of Wayne
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 2, 1932No. Docket Nos. 190, 191, Calendar Nos. 36,292, 36,293PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.
These two suits, consolidated in one appeal, are for damages sustained by the plaintiffs as a result of an automobile accident. Upon trial in the circuit court without a jury, plaintiffs each had judgment. The defendant has appealed.
About 6:30 in the morning of February 6, 1925, Clarence Humphrey, husband of plaintiff Ruth E. Humphrey, was riding in a Ford automobile owned and driven by the plaintiff David McArthur. Another man was riding with them to the Ford factory, where they were employed. Due to heavy fog, visibility was very bad. As they were going' along Fordson road, they reached the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lett v. Summerfield & HechtMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- Bowmaster v. William H. DePree Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Hoffman v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- Castille v. RichardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Elrich v. SchwadererMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Perkins v. Great Central Transport Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Chesson v. Nello L. Teer Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Ollgaard v. City of MarshallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- City of Knoxville v. HorneCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938