Legal Opinion

Stanton v. Saks

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1981No. 13177PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, an attorney, represented ap-pellee in a divorce action. When the case was settled a fee dispute arose. Appellant sought $1,201.31; he was awarded $300. We remand.

The case was tried to the court without a jury. Judgment was entered without findings of fact or conclusions of law. 1 No waiver of findings or conclusions appears in the record. SDCL 15-6-52(b). Consequently, the judgment lacks any foundation upon which it may be based. Accordingly, the case must be remanded for the entry of findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a judgment based thereupon, SDCL 15-6-52(a); Matter of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Dependency & Neglect of N. J. W.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Saunders v. HopkinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sorenson v. RickmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Stanton v. SaksSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  3. FIRST FED. SAV. & LOAN ASS'N, ETC. v. KellySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  4. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Rapid City v. KellySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Stratton v. HabegerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API