Stanton v. Saks
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Appellant, an attorney, represented ap-pellee in a divorce action. When the case was settled a fee dispute arose. Appellant sought $1,201.31; he was awarded $300. We remand.
The case was tried to the court without a jury. Judgment was entered without findings of fact or conclusions of law. 1 No waiver of findings or conclusions appears in the record. SDCL 15-6-52(b). Consequently, the judgment lacks any foundation upon which it may be based. Accordingly, the case must be remanded for the entry of findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a judgment based thereupon, SDCL 15-6-52(a); Matter of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re the Dependency & Neglect of N. J. W.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Saunders v. HopkinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sorenson v. RickmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Stanton v. SaksSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- FIRST FED. SAV. & LOAN ASS'N, ETC. v. KellySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Rapid City v. KellySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Stratton v. HabegerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.