Legal Opinion
Sorenson v. Rickman
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 10, 1992No. 17488PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMUNDSON, Justice.
Intervenors Leo Aldrich, Betty Whitting-ton, and Luann LaLonde (Intervenors) appeal from trial court’s entry of a peremptory writ of prohibition on April 5, 1991. We reverse.
FACTS
On January 21, 1991, the Deadwood, South Dakota, city council received a petition for annexation of property commonly known as “Bankrupt Billies.” At the time of such filing, Bankrupt Billies was not contiguous with the city of Deadwood’s existing city limits. Thus, on February 8, a second annexation petition was filed requesting annexation of certain property owned by Black Hills Light and Power…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- South Dakota Board of Regents v. HeegeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Bell v. Midland National Life Insurance CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
- Schmitt v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Heikkila v. CarverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Neal v. Board of Supervisors, Clarke CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- McElhaney v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Becker v. PfeiferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Bienert v. YANKTON SCHOOL DIST., 63-3South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re Writ of Certiorari as to the Determination of Election on the Brookings School District's Decision to Raise Additional General FundSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Bohn v. BuenoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.