Legal Opinion

Raladam Co. v. Federal Trade Commission

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 7, 1941No. 8026PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKS, Circuit Judge.

For the second time the Raladam Company petitions this court to review and set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission directing it to cease and desist from certain practices with reference to offering for sale, and sale and distribution, in interstate commerce, of a preparation known as Marmola and used in the treatment of obesity.

In the previous case [6 Cir., 42 F.2d 430] we vacated the order of the Commission on the ground that the evidence failed to disclose the existence of competition within the meaning of the Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 41 et seq.; and on the further…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Raladam Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. KlesnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Winsted Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Raladam Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
  5. Hunt v. Hobbs, Wall & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Raladam Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Hastings Mfg. Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API