Boose v. Henderson

I concur in what has been said in the opinion by Mr. Justice CHAPMAN. There is one further point, however, insisted upon by the appellants which I think should be discussed and determined. Appellants contend that the chancellor departed from the law of the case as established in our former opinion, Henderson v. Boose et ux., 142 Fla. 804, 196 So. 671, because in that opinion we said:

". . . and we hold that as a condition precedent to obtaining a cancellation of the tax deed she should under the circumstances of this case be required by the trial court to first pay into the registry of the…