Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State Highway Commission v. Wunderlich

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1943No. 35136PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

Appellant suggests a re-examination of the question of liability of the State Highway Commission for the extra compensation allowed by the trial court and affirmed by us. 10 So. (2d) 453. It is argued that to allow a recovery of interest and costs against appellant as an instrumentality of the state is to ignore prior decisions including Josselyn v. Stone, 28 Miss. 753; Board of Superisors of Warren County v. Klein, 51 Miss. 807; Board of Supervisors of Clay County v. Board of Supervisors of Chickasaw County, 64 Miss. 534, 1 So. 753; Anderson v. Board of Sup’rs of Issaquena County, 75 Miss.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Miller v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Boston Sand and Gravel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Standard Oil Co. of NJ v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. BatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  5. Josselyn v. StoneMississippi Supreme Court · 1855

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bankers Life & Cas. Co. v. CrenshawMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Warwick v. MatheneyMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Brand v. BrandMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Shapiro v. Kansas Public Employees Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  5. City of Mound Bayou v. Roy Collins Const.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API