Legal Opinion
Widener v. DISTRICT COURT OF CTY. OF JEFFERSON
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided August 18, 1980No. 80SA295PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lohr
We issued a rule directing the district court to show cause why the petition of Sonia F. Widener to permit late filing of a notice of appeal should not be granted. We now make that rule absolute.
Re/Max Suburban, Inc., obtained a judgment in the amount of $3,955 plus costs against Sonia F. Widener (defendant) in district court on or about March 13, 1980. On April 17, 1980, the,trial court denied the defendant’s motion for a new trial. The thirty-day period allowed by C.A.R. 4(a) for filing a notice of appeal in the trial court expired on May 19, 1980. On May 16 the defendant filed a motion to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Walter J. Cobb, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Jerry LewisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Pauline Des Isles, Formerly Known as Pauline M. Dinsmore v. Harry Evans and I. Evans, D/B/A Sea Gull Pool & Cabana ClubCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Comtrol, Inc. v. Mountain States Telephone & T. Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1973
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Audra H. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Department of Transportation v. GalleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Estep v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- People v. BakerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- People ex rel. S.R.M.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- Turkey Creek, LLC v. RosaniaColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
- Monaghan Farms, Inc. v. City & County of Denver Ex Rel. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.