Legal Opinion

McMinn v. Mammone

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 19, 1951No. Appeal, 21PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

Plaintiff is engaged in the business of supplying and installing heating equipment. This action was brought by him to recover damages for loss of profits on a contract with defendant which the defendant refused to allow him to perform. The jury found for the plaintiff.

In the light of the verdict these facts appear: following informal negotiations, plaintiff inspected two buildings owned by the defendant and was there informed by him as to specific changes which he contemplated in his heating systems. Plaintiff thereupon, as requested, addressed a written proposal to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Grubb v. RockeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Eaton v. N.Y. Life Ins. Co. of N.Y.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Smilow v. DickersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bokser v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Friedman v. SchoolmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Fischer v. AndersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. M. W. Zack Company, a Michigan Corporation v. R. D. Werner Co., Inc., a Pennsylvania CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
  5. Witt v. CrawfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API