Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Schoolman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 9, 1979No. 176, 203PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POMEROY, Justice.

Edward L. Friedman married appellant Beatrice Kamile Friedman on December 7, 1973. It was the second marriage for each, and they entered into an antenuptial agreement on the day of their wedding in which each renounced any interest in the estate of the other. Eleven days later Edward died, leaving a will executed in 1967, under which Beatrice takes nothing. In the court below Beatrice attacked the validity of the antenuptial agreement and asserted a breach by Edward of an oral contract to bequeath practically all of his estate to her. The orphans’ court upheld the…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. McClellan EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Strank v. Mercy Hospital of JohnstownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. In Re Estate of ZielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Hillegass EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Girsh TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hatbob v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Nitkiewicz v. NitkiewiczSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. In Re Estate of GeyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Creamer v. AIM Telephones, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Dion v. Dion, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API