State v. T. L. H.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Per curiam
In this appeal, appellant seeks reversal of an order committing her for a period not to exceed 180 days. See ORS 426.130. She contends, in an unpreserved assignment of error, that the order should be reversed because the trial court failed to inform her of her rights enumerated in ORS 426.100(1). The state concedes the error, and we agree that that court’s failure to advise appellant of her rights under ORS 426.100(1) constitutes plain error. See State v. Ritzman, 192 Or App 296, 298, 84 P3d 1129 (2004) (failure to advise the allegedly mentally ill person directly regarding the rights listed…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. M. L. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. RitzmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. C. J. C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017