Legal Opinion

Moore v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 28, 1973PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJasen, J.

Plaintiff commenced this action on behalf of himself and, as a class action, on behalf of all other similarly situated employees of the State of New York, to recover benefits for the services of a psychologist under a group major medical expense policy issued by the defendant insurance company (Metropolitan). There are two appeals before us, one concerning the merits of the claim for benefits, and the other involving plaintiff’s right to bring a class action.

Turning first to the individual claim, plaintiff contends, and the courts below agreed, that Metropolitan’s action in refusing payment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Neblett v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Mulligan v. Travelers Insurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  3. Mulligan v. Travelers Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1954

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Becker v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Sperry v. Crompton Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Friar v. Vanguard Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. Higby v. MahoneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Borden v. 400 East 55th Street Associates, L.P.New York Court of Appeals · 2014

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API