Haas v. Berrien County Sheriff's Department
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ENSLEN, District Judge.
This is a section 1983 action in which defendants arrested plaintiff, pursuant to a warrant, and detained her for three days even though she was innocent of the charges against her. Defendants apparently relied on erroneous information supplied by a confidential informant in securing a warrant and arresting and detaining plaintiff. Presently pending before the Court for decision is defendants’ January 14, 1987 motion for judgment on the plead ings and plaintiffs February 17, 1987 motion for default. For the reasons discussed below, the Court will treat…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Donald L. Hays, Jr., and Michael C. Potter, Cross-Appellants v. Jefferson County, Kentucky, Wilbur Bilyeu and Russell McDaniel Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Haverstick Enterprises, Inc. v. Financial Federal Credit, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1992
- Austin v. City of East Grand RapidsDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1988