Legal Opinion

State v. Henderson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 11, 2000No. 23154-9-IIPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridgewater, C.J.

Darryl A. Henderson appeals the trial court’s imposition of a standard range sentence of 41 months upon resentencing which was necessitated by misinformation at the original sentencing, which led to the miscalculation of his standard range. We hold that when “specific performance” is the remedy selected by the defendant, the prosecutor is bound to make the recommendation it agreed to make, but the court is not required to sentence according to that recommendation. We affirm.

On September 2, 1997, Henderson entered an Alford 1 plea to a charge of unlawful possession of a firearm in the first…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. WakefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. BarberWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. HarrisonWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. HarrisonWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. Van BurenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. State v. Van BurenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API