Legal Opinion

Long v. Arkansas Foundry Co.

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided January 5, 1956No. Civ. A. No. 2849PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TRIMBLE, Chief Judge.

This action was begun on August 2, 1954, by Russell E. Long, patentee, and Virgle Coleman, James R. Guerin and Earl Van Horn, partners doing business as Crossville Tool & Machine Co., licensees, against Arkansas Foundry Company, a corporation, alleging infringement of a patent. This patent, being No. 2,650,628 was issued to Long on September 1, 1953, for a Tree Feller and Land Clearing Attachment. The complaint is short and does no more than advise the defendant that it is being sued for infringement of the numbered patent.

Pursuant to notice and agreement of parties the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Brown v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  5. Radio Corp. of America v. Radio Engineering Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Long v. Arkansas Foundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
  2. Container Corporation of America, a Corporation v. M.C.S. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  3. Comiskey Engineering Co. v. Joseph Buegeleisen Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1962
  4. Long v. Arkansas Foundry CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
  5. Hamlin v. McAlpin Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API