Crepaldi v. Wagner
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
WIGGINTON, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff has brought this interlocutory appeal from an order granting defendant’s motion for summary decree. The principal thrust of appellant’s position is that from the pleadings, deposition and affidavits on file in the cause there is created a genuine issue of a material fact relating to the question of whether defendant is the father of plaintiff’s newly born child. Appellant therefore contends that the chancellor erred in disposing of this issue on motion for summary decree, thereby depriving her of the right to a trial by jury as permitted by statute.1
The action…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crovella v. CochraneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- Hilton v. HiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Kessler v. LoersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
- Halavin v. Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
- Lyons v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
3Cited by7 opinions
- Eberhardy v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1975
- E_ S v. G_ M_ SMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- Reserve Insurance Co. v. DayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Wilson v. State Road Department of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
- Strode v. Southern Steel Construction Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.