Legal Opinion

Whorton v. Bockting

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 28, 2007No. 05-595PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alito

This case presents the question whether, under the rules set out in Teague v. Lane, 489 U. S. 288 (1989), our decision in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U. S. 36 (2004), is retroactive to cases already final on direct review. We hold that it is not.

I

A

Respondent Marvin Bockting lived in Las Vegas, Nevada, with his wife, Laura Bockting, their 3-year-old daughter Honesty, and Laura’s 6-year-old daughter from a previous relationship, Autumn. One night, while respondent was at work, Autumn awoke from a dream crying, but she refused to tell her mother what was wrong, explaining: “ ‘[D]addy said you…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Newsome v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  2. Garcia v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
  3. Benjamin C. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2026
  4. Casiano v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015
  5. Franks v. Lens.com, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API