Legal Opinion

Bauman v. Beaujean

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 19, 1966No. Civ. 654PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.

Gail Bauman, who was approximately three and one-half years of age at the time of her injury, and her father, Russell H. Bauman, brought suit against the defendant owners of a dog which bit Gail on the Beau jean home premises. While the pleadings and, to a certain extent, the pretrial order seem to implement issues under the old vicious animal theory and the defenses adjusted to that theory, it is the conclusion of counsel for both appellants and respondents that the case was tried, and that the appeal turns exclusively, on the provision of section 3342 of the Civil Code.

In this connection,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ellis v. D'AngeloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Heller v. New York, N. H. & H. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
  3. Gomes v. ByrneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Burks v. BlackmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Collins v. GravesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Gary E. Calkins Anna Rosa Calkins, D/B/A Indio Grocery OutletCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. Smith v. Cap Concrete, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Insurance v. AndersonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972
  4. Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Insurance v. AndersonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972
  5. Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API