Legal Opinion

In re Flournoy

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided March 31, 2017No. Case No. 16-21984-GMHPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

G. Michael Halfenger, United States Bankruptcy Judge

Jamiela Flournoy and Vernon Shaw jointly incurred debt to purchase a car. They gave the lender a lien on the car to secure repayment. Flournoy alone filed a chapter 13 case. She seeks to modify the creditor’s rights through her chapter 13 plan so that the lien terminates when she receives a discharge. The creditor objects to plan confirmation.

Because the Bankruptcy Code does not authorize Flournoy to eliminate the lien on Shaw’s interest in the car, the court construes her plan to modify the creditor’s lien only on her…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. EspinosaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Johnson v. Home State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Nobelman v. American Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Java BerryUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2023
  2. Monita E. CoffeyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2022
  3. Vicki Lyn ButtelUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API