Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 20, 1986No. 71955PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Benham, Judge.

Appellant and a co-defendant were jointly tried in a bifurcated proceeding for armed robbery and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Appellant was found guilty of the possession charge and robbery. The appellate decision in his co-defendant’s appeal is found in Dye v. State, 177 Ga. App. 824 (341 SE2d 314) (1986).

1. Appellant first argues that his motions for directed verdicts of acquittal were improperly denied. In light of the Supreme Court’s recent holding in Milam v. State, 255 Ga. 560 (341 SE2d 216) (1986), we disagree.

In the first portion of the bifurcated…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Coker v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Milam v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  3. Durden v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  4. Head v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  5. Coker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Blake v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  3. Simpson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  4. Hindman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  5. Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API