Legal Opinion

Longstreet v. Nines

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided October 2, 2023No. 1:23-cv-00760Unknown

1Opinion

USDC- □□□□□ "23 OCT 2 pw IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT _ FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND ) WYSAN R. LONGSTREET, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) Civil Action No. 1:23-cv-0760-LKG V. ) ) Dated: October 2, 2023 JEFF NINES, ) MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL, _ ) ) Respondents. ) RS le a) MEMORANDUM OPINION In response to the above-entitled Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, Respondents assert that Petitioner’s claim of ineffective assistance of post- conviction counsel is not a cognizable ground for federal habeas relief and that the remaining claims are time-barred or procedurally…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Buck v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  4. Wilson v. CorcoranSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Percy Stanley Harris v. Ronald Hutchinson, Warden, Maryland House of Corrections J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General of the State of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API