Legal Opinion

People v. Pandiello

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided November 3, 2016Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Steven M. Statsinger, J.

In a criminal contempt case, the identity of the complainant is an element of the offense. Defendant stands accused of criminal contempt because a police officer saw him speaking to a person that the officer has asserted was the protected party in three orders of protection entered against the defendant. However, the information does not explain either how the officer knew who this person was or how he knew that she was in fact the protected party.

In what appears to be a case of first impression, the court agrees with the defendant that these…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. CaseyNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. People v. JenningsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. People v. DumasNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. People v. KalinNew York Court of Appeals · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API