Legal Opinion

Claim of Dasaro v. Ford Motor Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 13, 1952PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBergan, J.

Claimant suffered an epileptic seizure on the employer’s premises while waiting to begin his day’s work. He fell and suffered a compression fracture of the ninth dorsal vertebra. The Workmen’s Compensation Board has disallowed his claim for compensation and he appeals.

It is the claimant’s factual contention that when he became unconscious and fell he struck his back against a radiator or chair in the premises. The board, however, has distinctly found as a fact that claimant did not strike a radiator or chair. While there is a dispute about this we are required to accept that finding as true…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of Connelly v. Samaritan HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Claim of Andrews v. L. & S. Amusement Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Claim of Mausert v. Albany Builders Supply Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Luvaul v. A. Ray Barker Motor CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Riley v. Oxford Paper Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1954
  3. Zuchowski v. UNITED STATES RUBBER COMPANYSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967
  4. Howard v. Ford Motor CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
  5. Claim of Montanari v. Lehigh Portland Cement Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API