Legal Opinion
Adams v. Long
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided December 31, 1943No. 1670PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REEVES, District Judge.
The question for decision in this case is whether a federal question appears from the face of the complaint, and, even if so, whether this court should exercise jurisdiction. The suit is filed under the provision of Section 216, Title 29 U.S.C.A., being the Fair Labor Standards Act, and the total amount claimed is $1,161.10. It is a claim for overtime under Section 207 of said Title 29 U.S.C.A. The only averment in the complaint pertinent to the question under discussion is as follows: “ * * * that at all times herein mentioned there were in full force and effect the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Mechanics Universal Joint Co. v. CulhaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Viles v. SymesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- Barnhart v. Western Maryland Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
- Armstrong v. Alliance Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Johnson v. Butler Bros.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
- Olson v. REMBRANDT PRINTING COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1974
- Morrison v. Jack Richards Aircraft Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1971
- Harrington v. Empire Const. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1947
- Swettman v. Remington Rand, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.