Legal Opinion

American Wholesale Corp. v. Kahn

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 19, 1930No. 20936; 20937PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

1. Since the passage of the statute of 52 Henry III., 1267, allowing costs to defendants in suits where the plaintiffs fail to recover, an action for maliciously bringing a suit can not be maintained unless .it be shown that the defendant had maliciously sued the plaintiff, either with the intent to imprison him, or to attach his property, or to do him some special damage; and this must be set out specially. Mitchell v. Southwestern Railroad, 75 Ga. 398 (3), 405. See McElreath v. Gross, 23 Ga. App. 287 (98 S. E. 190) ; Short v. Spragins, 104 Ga. 628 (30 S. E. 810) ; Ehrlich v. Exchange Bank,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Southwestern RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  2. McElreath v. GrossCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  3. Short & Co. v. Spragins, Buck & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  4. Williams v. AdelmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  5. Ehrlich v. Exchange BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jacksonville Paper Co. v. OwenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. Price v. Fidelity Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  3. Swain v. American Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  4. Taylor v. GreinerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  5. Davis v. PaulkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API