Legal Opinion

Holley v. Tate & Lyle

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided August 15, 2001No. 2000-CA-2234PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

hSTEVEN R. PLOTKIN, Judge.

This workers’ compensation case involves two pivotal issues regarding the interpretation of the pre-1999 amendment version of LSA-R.S. 28:1223, which allowed an employer to deduct the “amount of compensation” paid in total temporary disability (“TTD”) payments to any employee from supplemental earnings benefits (“SEB”) owed to that party: (1) whether the deduction should be dollar-for-dollar or week-for-week, and (2) whether the deduction should be taken at the beginning of the period for which the employee is entitled to SEB or the end. Defendants, Tate & Lyle…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bruno v. Harbert Intern. Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  2. Banks v. Indus. Roofing & Sheet MetalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  3. Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  4. Daigle v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  5. Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Robert J. Caluda, APLC v. New Orleans CityDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2019
  2. State of Louisiana v. Sullivan WalterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API