James v. State

— The defendant was convicted of the offense of buying, receiving, concealing, or aiding in concealing a bale of cotton, knowing it to be stolen, and not having the intent to restore it to the owner.

The bill of exceptions shows objection after objection made to questions calling for manifestly legal testimony clearly admissible in evidence.' In every instance a motion is shoAvn to have been made to exclude the answer, and exception reserved to the adverse ruling of the court. It would appear, from the fact that one of the grounds of objection stated in nearly every instance was “that the…