Legal Opinion
Milam v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided October 10, 1940No. 7 Div. 637PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The decision of the Court of Appeals to which the Attorney General’s petition for certiorari is directed is “the holding that there was a variance in the indictment and the proof.”
The indictment is in two counts, that the defendant “feloniously took and carried away one No. 64% Marcy-Ball Mill, of the value of $1,500.00, the personal property of Martin Jenkins Norrell;” and that the defendant “did buy, receive, conceal, or aid in concealing, one No. 64% Marcy-Ball Mill, of the value of $1,500.00, the personal property of Martin Jenkins Norrell, knowing it to have been stolen,…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Bryant v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
- Felix v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
- McGehee v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- People v. LardnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of Alabama · 1844
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. Walter J. Barlow, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Rowe v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Isbell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1976
- Hale v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1969
- Tanner v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.