Legal Opinion
United States v. Rodríguez-Peña
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided December 11, 2006No. 06-1679PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
Defendant Héctor Rodríguez-Peña, having been convicted of multiple criminal offenses back in 1993, appeals from the denial of his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). It being clear that no such relief is warranted, we summarily affirm.
In relevant part, § 3582(c) provides that, where a defendant was sentenced “based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission,” the district court may reduce that sentence “if such a reduction is consistent with applicable policy statements issued by the ... Commission.” 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). A…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Matthew Mark MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Leonard R. FullerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Hamedah A. Hasan, Also Known as Stephanie LomaxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Witty v. DukakisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. CaraballoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- United States v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. EtienneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- United States v. FanfanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Rivera-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.