State v. Martinez
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, C.J.
¶1 Article I, section 7 of our state constitution requires that an investigatory stop be based on articulable particularized facts that support a substantial possibility that a person is engaged in criminal activity. State v. Kennedy, 107 Wn.2d 1, 6, 726 P.2d 445 (1986). Here, an officer was patrolling on foot in an apartment complex located in a high crime area. Vehicle prowling had been reported there in the past. The officer saw Jeremiah Martinez near several parked cars. Mr. Martinez walked quickly away. The officer asked him whether he lived there. Mr. Martinez said he did not. So the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. Z.U.E.Washington Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. BlissCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. BlissCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. MorenoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- State v. Cardenas-MuratallaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.