Legal Opinion

State v. Martinez

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 28, 2006No. 23751-6-IIIPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, C.J.

¶1 Article I, section 7 of our state constitution requires that an investigatory stop be based on articulable particularized facts that support a substantial possibility that a person is engaged in criminal activity. State v. Kennedy, 107 Wn.2d 1, 6, 726 P.2d 445 (1986). Here, an officer was patrolling on foot in an apartment complex located in a high crime area. Vehicle prowling had been reported there in the past. The officer saw Jeremiah Martinez near several parked cars. Mr. Martinez walked quickly away. The officer asked him whether he lived there. Mr. Martinez said he did not. So the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. Z.U.E.Washington Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. BlissCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. State v. BlissCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. State v. MorenoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  5. State v. Cardenas-MuratallaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API