Legal Opinion

Blood Systems, Inc. v. Roesler

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided September 24, 2013No. CV-11-02133-PHX-ROSPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ROSLYN O. SILVER, Senior District Judge.

Defendants Joseph and Pauline Roesler move for summary judgment and the law firm of Levenbaum & Cohen moves for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs. As set forth below, the Roeslers are entitled to summary judgment and Levenbaum & Cohen is entitled to its attorneys’ fees and costs.

BACKGROUND

The parties disagree on the most basic of facts, making it difficult to set forth a *1153clear and concise statement of the factual background. For present purposes, only the following facts are important. As of May 2009, Defendant Pauline Roesler worked for Blood…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Hardt v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Hummell v. S. E. Rykoff & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Solie v. Health Care@Home LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
  2. Worldwide v. Toulatos SilbermanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API