Legal Opinion
Knight v. Breckheimer
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 2, 1985No. 2648PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The plaintiffs instituted an action for damages against the defendants alleging fraudulent misrepresentation, failure to disclose and breach of warranty arising out of the sale of a residence. From a judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendants, the plaintiffs have appealed.
The trial court found the following facts: On July 1, 1976, the parties entered into a written agreement whereby the plaintiffs would purchase the defendants’ home located at 24 Glen Hill Road, Wilton. The defendants, whose family consisted of three people, had not encountered any serious problem with…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Johnson v. FlammiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Scribner v. O'Brien, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Birnbaum v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Campbell v. RawlsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Powers v. OlsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Mongillo v. Commissioner of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Matyas v. MinckConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Knight v. McCainMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
- In re David E.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.