Legal Opinion

Cincinnati & Chicago Railroad v. Huncheon

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1861PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from the restraining order of a judge, in vacation.

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

The appellees were the plaintiffs below, and Ihe appellant the defendant. The complaint alleges, substantially, these facts : Plaintiffs owned, in fee simple, sections fifteen and sixteen, in township thirty three, north of range four, west. Defendants, prior to July 13, 1859, located their railroad across said lands. At that date, the plaintiffs caused the damages which would be occasioned by the construction *437of tbe road to be assessed: and the same were then assessed S at $687 TSo°o • Judgment in their favor was rendered thereon, in the Lagporte Common Pleas. And the defendants, without…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wallace v. McVeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Terre Haute & Logansport Railway Co. v. St. Joseph, South Bend & Southern RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Pleasants v. Vevay & Moorefield Turnpike Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Brennan v. LucklearIndiana Superior Court · 1871

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API