Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Arkansas Fuel Oil Corp.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 14, 1956No. 8498Published

1DissentGladney, Judge

In order to avoid conflict with the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, Art. I, Sec. 8, the power use tax was based upon the power generated and employed. See: Coverdale v. Arkansas-Louisiana Pipeline Co., 303 U.S. 604, 58 S.Ct. 736, 82 L.Ed. 1043, a test case wherein the impost was recognized to be a tax on the activity of generating power as distinct from the activity of applying the power to operate transmission service. It is, therefore, a privilege, excise or occupational license tax, but is in no sense a property tax, although measured by the horsepower capacity of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Coverdale v. Arkansas-Louisiana Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. State Ex Rel. Porterie v. H. L. Hunt, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  3. State v. Triangle Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
  4. State Ex Rel. Fontenot v. Standard Dredging Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API