Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Eastvold v. Maybury

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1956No. 33799PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

This action challenges the validity of a specific section of a resolution adopted by the state capitol committee authorizing a bond issue.

The state capítol committee is composed of the governor, the state auditor, and the commissioner of public lands, ex officio. RCW 43.34.010.

RCW 43.34.060 provides:

“All revenues received from leases and sales of lands, timber, and other products on the surface or beneath the surface of the lands granted to the state by the United States pursuant to an act of congress approved February 22, 1889, for capítol building purposes, shall be paid into the capítol…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. State Board of Medical Examiners v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. DenneyWashington Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ortblad v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State Ex Rel. Wash. Toll Bridge Auth. v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Local 2916, IAFF v. Public Employment Relations CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Purse Seine Vessel Owners Ass'n v. MoosWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  5. McGraw v. HansbargerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API