Legal Opinion
Friedman v. Garey
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 17, 2004PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura Visitacion-Lewis, J.), entered February 9, 2004, which granted plaintiffs motion to enforce the stipulated agreement settling this divorce action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The written settlement agreement, although unsigned by defendant, was stipulated to by counsel in open court and was thus binding on the parties (CPLR 2104; Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224 [1984]; Rubenfeld v Rubenfeld, 279 AD2d 153 [2001]). Moreover, defendant implicitly ratified the settlement by accepting substantial sums under its terms, and with respect…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hallock v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Silicone Breast Implant Litigation v. Bristol-Myers Squibb & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Rubenfeld v. RubenfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3Cited by6 opinions
- Storette v. StoretteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Pretterhofer v. PretterhoferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Wilson v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Shah v. Wilco Systems, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Rio v. RioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.