Legal Opinion · Dissent

Terrell v. Garcia

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 9, 1973No. 15174Published

1DissentCadena, Justice

I see no reason for holding that a person whose negligent conduct produces a result which he must have foreseen is not liable for the consequences of his negligent act. The majority opinion bases this absolution of the negligent actor on social policy and the difficulty which the victim would encounter in attempting to prove the extent of his damages.

Recent decisions of the United States Supreme Court, however much these fieri-1 sions may be condemned as being based on unacceptable moral standards, establish the legal right of persons to resort to procfc-dures which will prevent conception…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Doe v. BoltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Hays v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Fussner v. AndertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API