First Rome Bank v. Reese Oil Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Andrews, Judge.
First Rome Bank, defendant below, appeals the grant of partial summary judgment to Reese Oil Company, Inc. on a claim for conversion under OCGA § 11-3-419.
Viewed in favor of the bank, opponent of summary judgment, the undisputed facts were that Reese Oil had an account with First Rome. Reese Oil supplied First Rome with its corporate authorization, which showed three authorized signers for the account: Sam Reese, Jr., president and sole stockholder of the company; W. C. Reese, Sam’s brother and vice-president of the company; and Dorothy Reese, Sam’s wife and secretary-treasurer…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ham v. HamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- National Bank v. Refrigerated Transport Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Scott v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Bank South v. Grand Lodge of Free & Accepted MasonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Peppers v. SieffermanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Delta Chemical and Petroleum, Inc. v. Citizens Bank of ByhaliaCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2001
- Hale Haven Properties, LLC v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
- Abdalla v. DDCB, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995