Legal Opinion

Razorback Cab of Ft. Smith, Inc. v. Flowers

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 4, 1997No. 96-3042PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Razorback Cab of Ft. Smith, Inc. (Razorback) appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of its suit against two public officials. Razorback sought declaratory and injunctive relief against Dan Flowers, Director of the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department, and Stribling Boynton, Administrator of the city of Fort Smith, Arkansas, contending that they violated its constitutional rights to due process and equal protection as well as its alleged rights under the Urban Mass Transportation Act of 1964 (UMT Act), as amended, 49 U.S.C. §§ 5301-5338 (1994), and certain state laws and city…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Rhea Dopico v. Neil E. Goldschmidt, Disabled in Action v. Neil E. GoldschmidtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  3. William Baker v. Dean BellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  4. David B. Cohen v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
  5. United Handicapped Federation v. AndreCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pinkham v. United States (In Re Pinkham)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri · 1998
  2. Pendergrass v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
  3. Razorback Cab Of Ft. Smith, Inc. v. Dan FlowersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API