Legal Opinion

Tietz v. Textron, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided June 16, 1982No. 80-C-849PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION and ORDER

MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge.

The plaintiffs seek an order requiring the defendants to designate and produce certain witnesses to testify at depositions to be conducted in England. The depositions relate to the plaintiffs’ efforts to discover details concerning the design, manufacture and sale of a milling machine which was allegedly responsible for Ms. Tietz’ injuries.

I had previously established a time limit relative to the completion of discovery and, pursuant to a joint request of counsel, extended that deadline to October 30, 1982. It would appear that the time…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Haviland & Co. v. Montgomery Ward & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  2. Reliable Volkswagen Sales & Service Co. v. World-Wide Automobiles Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1960
  3. Sykes International, Ltd. v. Pilch's Poultry Breeding Farms, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1972

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. D'AGOSTINO v. Johnson & JohnsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API